Showing posts with label ABC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ABC. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2025

Reflecting And Remembering "Big" George Foreman

There are points where those of us who cover the sport, who follow their passion and love for Boxing, often referred to as “The Fight Game," where one reflects on those who helped build that love for the sport. Unfortunately, such reflections often come upon sad news that as time goes on, one knows the time will come where it will be time to pay tribute to legends as they unfortunately leave us. Although this observer does not look forward to penning such pieces, if one is a true Boxing lifer, which I am proud to be one, and takes the vocation of covering the sport seriously, it unfortunately comes with the territory.


The Boxing world was hit with a massive blow on March 21, 2025 when news emerged that former Olympic Gold Medalist, two-time World Heavyweight champion, ordained minister, preacher, entrepreneur, pitchman, one-time actor, author, Boxing commentator, and Hall of Famer “Big" George Foreman passed away in his native Houston, TX at the age of 76. Frankly, even though I obviously knew that Foreman was in his 70’s, and had not fought in a Boxing ring in nearly 28 years, the news of his passing still hit me hard. 


Perhaps the reason for that is because Foreman along with several others all influenced me to not only follow the sport to the point where the term “Boxing Lifer” is more than appropriate, but to ultimately enter Boxing as well as other combat sports as a writer. Obviously, there will be scribes throughout the sport that will talk a great deal about Foreman winning the Gold medal in the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City, and the reign of terror he inflicted upon the Heavyweight division upon turning professional and throughout the 1970’s highlighted by his destruction of Joe Frazier to win the World Heavyweight championship in 1973, his equally brutal knockout of Ken Norton in 1974 in a title defense, his losing the title to Muhammad Ali as the victim of Ali’s “Rope A Dope" strategy that saw Ali take a brutal beating at the hands of Foreman for seven rounds before turning the tables on an exhausted champion and knocking him out in the eighth round to take the title from him, to the time when he once fought five men in one night in a sideshow exhibition, to his legendary battle against Ron Lyle, to his loss to Jimmy Young, which led to his embarking on a path that saw him become an ordained minister. All of which are important to Foreman's story and deserve to be discussed as I am doing here, but yours truly has a bit of a different perspective on Foreman's career.


While I studied all of the above and all of Foreman's career, I did not enter the world until the 1980’s and as such, my exposure to George Foreman began during his comeback period, which started in 1987. A comeback that would go down as probably one of the greatest in all of sports was initially viewed by many as skeptical and treated by some as an outright joke. The reason for this is Foreman was not only returning to the ring ten years after retiring following his loss to Jimmy Young in 1977, at the age of 38, which was unheard of at the time, but also Foreman returned not as a scary, physically imposing monster he had been back in his prime, but as a pudgy pitchman, who was a master at drawing interest in his fights as well as being a much more outwardly publicly engaging, friendly individual than had been the case in his prime.


At the time as a young kid, one of my favorite things to do was watch Boxing with my father. In the late 1980’s, there were weekly series on cable television dedicated to Boxing here in the United States, which aired on both USA Network and ESPN. Along with Heavyweights like Ray Mercer and future Foreman opponent Tommy Morrison, who were just starting their professional careers, both networks served as platforms for Foreman's comeback in its early stages. While frankly most of Foreman's opposition from 1987 to 1990 were overmatched opponents designed to help Foreman work off what is often referred to as “Ring Rust," every time Foreman fought, my father and I were watching. It did not take long for me to become a fan and part of that was aided by my father telling me stories about Foreman in the 1970’s as well as helping me gain access to footage of classic fight films whenever he could. 


In 1990, however, Foreman's comeback was turned serious by those who initially scoffed at his attempt to return to the ring to reclaim the World Heavyweight championship. First in January of that year and in an attempt to test the waters of his marketability over age 40, Foreman headlined a pay-per-view card where he scored a brutal second round knockout of longtime Heavyweight contender and former world title challenger Gerry Cooney, sending him into retirement. Although some remained skeptical given that Cooney was attempting a comeback himself following a three year hiatus when he fought Foreman, the skepticism began to quiet down when in June of that year, Foreman took on South American Heavyweight champion Addilson Rodrigues, who had recently fought Evander Holyfield, who at the time was the number one Heavyweight contender, and, despite losing to Holyfield, still maintained a top ten ranking amongst the sport’s respective sanctioning organizations. 


As he had done to Cooney, Foreman made quick work of Rodrigues, knocking him out in the second round. Following a one round knockout of veteran Terry Anderson in September of that year, Foreman found himself in position to face the new Undisputed World Heavyweight champion Evander Holyfield in April 1991 in an attempt to regain the title. 


Known as “The Battle of the Ages," many did not give Foreman a chance outside of a possible quick knockout citing both his age 42 at the time, as well as a superbly conditioned Holyfield, who was just entering his athletic prime and had introduced methods into his training regime that had never been seen in the sport before. To the surprise of some, Foreman proved to be competitive, engaging in a twelve round toe to toe classic battle with Holyfield including somehow being able to withstand a brutal barrage of punches from Holyfield in the seventh round, where the champion fired off twenty-six unanswered punches, many of which landed flush, but could not knock Foreman down.


Despite his ability to stand up to that assault, which to this day, this observer still cannot figure out how he was able to, and putting up a great fight, Foreman did not succeed in taking the title from Holyfield in losing a twelve round unanimous decision. Although at this point, Foreman had proven to be just as legitimate a fighter as he had been in the 1970’s when he was champion and arguably the most feared fighter in the sport, as well as being a better fighter in terms of technique and ability to be both patient and relaxed in the midst of battle during his comeback rather than the physically imposing figure that frankly steamrolled most of his opponents, following the loss to Holyfield, almost instinctively, speculation started as to whether Foreman would continue fighting.


In some ways, it was understandable given his age, but again such speculation was largely rooted in the fact that Foreman was doing something that had not been seen before in Boxing in coming back after a long retirement and doing so at an advanced age. Even though the inspiration for such an attempt was likely at least in part due to the legendary former Light-Heavyweight world champion Archie Moore, who pioneered the concept of fighting to an advanced age retiring at age 49 in 1963 and who assisted in Foreman's training going as far back as the 1970’s, who was also still in his corner for many of his fights along the comeback trail, even Moore had not done what Foreman had in taking a lengthy absence from the sport to come back much further down the line.


The speculation of what Foreman would do after the Holyfield fight did not last long as he went back to the drawing board and began working his way back towards another opportunity at a world championship. While today it is unfortunately common to see fighters at times use their name recognition value as a means of trying to get opportunities to fight for world titles rather than fighting their way into that position, Foreman chose to fight three times between his return in December 1991 following his loss to Holyfield and 1993, going 3-0 with 2 Knockouts during that stretch.


This set him up for another title shot, this time the WBO World Heavyweight championship, which was vacant at the time. The shot would come against fellow “Knockout Artist" Tommy Morrison on June 7, 1993. Although the WBO was not viewed by some as a legitimate sanctioning organization at the time, it was still for a version of the World Heavyweight championship and thus, offered Foreman a chance to achieve his goal of regaining a world title.


Unlike in his previous title shot two years earlier, Foreman, 44 at the time, was considered the favorite over Morrison, who himself was making a second attempt at a world title after being on the receiving end of a brutal knockout at the hands of then unbeaten WBO world champion Ray Mercer in 1991. Perhaps because of what happened in that fight as well as Morrison's come forward style, which while exciting, also left him vulnerable to being caught and hurt by an opponent's offense, was the reason why many including yours truly felt Foreman's experience, his own punching power, and technique would be too much for the always “Game," but seemingly limited Morrison.


Despite every metric that one could use as a comparable breakdown with the exception of age seeming to tip in the favor of Foreman and the expectation of most of a short, but explosive fight for as long as it would last, Morrison went against his come forward, aggressive nature in producing what would turn out to be the performance of his career, a tactical Boxing strategy that resulted in a not so entertaining fight to defeat Foreman and win the title via twelve round unanimous decision.


As was the case following his loss to Holyfield, instinctively, many felt that this for Foreman, who had already begun to establish what would be an outstanding and respected career as a commentator working for HBO Sports two years before the Morrison fight, would be the end for him as a fighter. Although Foreman never made any official announcement, it appeared more or less confirmed when advertisements for various products including Meineke began populating both television and radio featuring “Big" George the pitchman. Foreman would also be featured in several video games as well. This would be followed by Foreman starring in his own sitcom “George" in which he played George Foster a retired boxer and former World Heavyweight champion who ran an after school program for troubled students, which ran on ABC television here in the United States from November 1993 to January 1994. While in many ways obviously inspired by Foreman’s own work as a minister in also running the George Foreman Youth and Community Center in his native Texas, which ultimately led to his returning to the ring in 1987 looking in part to keep that center open, the series, which this observer thoroughly enjoyed and looked forward to watching on Tuesday nights at the time, shortly before flipping to USA Network to watch the weekly Tuesday Night Fights series, did not last long.


Perhaps the reason for that was, despite having a successful career as a broadcaster, what would eventually become a very lucrative career as a pitchman and entrepreneur including the now world famous George Foreman Grill line of products, and seemingly venturing into the general entertainment space, Foreman still had unfinished business in the Boxing ring.


In November 1994, Foreman would return once more, this time opting to use his name recognition clout to secure an opportunity for another title shot, this time against unbeaten two-time Heavyweight world champion Michael Moorer, who held the IBF/WBA unified world championship at the time. Although Foreman was criticized heavily for receiving this opportunity given what had not been a good performance against Tommy Morrison a year earlier and attempts by the World Boxing Association to prevent the fight from happening, which saw Foreman successfully defeat the WBA legally, the fight would happen on November 5th at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas.


At this point in my life, I was about a year away from stumbling upon the journey that I am still on covering the sport. I was, however, very much looking forward to the fight as I do for mostly any fight that I cover or watch to this day with rare exceptions. My father was also looking forward to seeing Foreman getting one more chance to regain the title, but we both felt that after what happened against Morrison that if it were going to happen, Foreman would have to catch Moorer early.


There had been evidence in the years prior that the possibility of Foreman catching Moorer early existed, despite the champion being younger, unbeaten, and just entering his prime at the time of the bout. Both Bert Cooper, who Moorer defeated in 1992 for the vacant WBO world title and Alex Stewart, who Moorer had knocked out in one of the best fights of 1991, coincidentally two former Foreman opponents that he had defeated during his comeback period, had each come close to knocking Moorer out, and in Cooper’s case, had knocked Moorer down in their fight, before both ultimately were stopped by Moorer. Despite these facts, conventional wisdom of Moorer defeating Foreman, much like Holyfield had done three years earlier, seemed to be the opinion of most fans and experts.


For most of the fight, it appeared as though that would be the case as Moorer put forth a superb Boxing performance, using his movement and combination punching to keep Foreman off balance and unable to get his punches off consistently. As this fight was going on, my father casually told me that he felt Foreman was setting a trap and was setting Moorer up. What would follow is a memory I cherish and a memory for the Denison family that is still talked about by yours truly whenever I talk about this fight, which has also become emotional for me since losing my father any time I watch this fight back to this day.


For a significant period of my youth my family and I had a floor television that my father referred to as “The Old Girl" because it was a television encased in a large wooden cabinet that would take my father using a hand truck and someone who was physically able to spot him whenever the television had to be moved so he would not drop it or otherwise damage it. The reason I bring up that story, particularly for those who may not be old enough to remember floor televisions, is it was not uncommon to lay on the floor and watch TV during those days. Some of my favorite memories as a child were spent in front of that television with my father and my sisters. 


On the night of Moorer-Foreman, as the fight became increasingly one-sided in favor of Moorer, I began to nod off on our living room floor in front of the TV. Not because I lost interest, but likely because I got comfortable. In any event, as the fight progressed and I continued to nod off as Moorer was frankly dominating with each passing round, my father, who was sitting on the couch continued to say with conviction, “Beau, I'm telling you Foreman is setting him (Moorer) up." I did not disagree with him, but I told him that it looked like Foreman was having trouble getting his punches off. A sentiment that was echoed by the late great trainer and broadcaster Gil Clancy, who was serving as a commentator for HBO Sports in the role usually filled by Foreman. Clancy, who was empathic in the pre-fight discussions prior to the bout in saying he did not see a way Foreman could win. As the fight went on Clancy continued to drive his point home saying Foreman was a 45 year old man in a young man’s game and alluding to Foreman's inability to get his punches off consistently as attributable to slowed reflexes, which is a common issue for fighters as they age. 


As this was going on the legendary Teddy Atlas, who was Moorer’s trainer, told his charge that though he was proud of what he was seeing, to not stay in front of Foreman for too long because Atlas felt that Foreman was looking to set him up for one shot, appearing to see the same thing my father had seen from very early in the fight. By the ninth round, I was going in and out of consciousness, but I had no idea that history was looming and about to be made.


Towards that point in the fight, Moorer though still in control, had stopped using as much movement and seemed more comfortable to stand in front of Foreman, appearing to give the impression that whatever punching power Foreman had did not concern him. In round ten, Foreman gradually took control landing punches that moved Moorer into position for two one, two combinations, the second of which put Moorer flat on his back on the canvas.


When this sequence happened initially, I had nodded off and did not see it initially. My father, who was a big and imposing figure in his own right proceeded to jump over our coffee table and in a scene that likely resembled the late professional wrestler King Kong Bundy going for his finishing maneuver a big splash, my father came down onto me and roused me up screaming as loud as he could, “Beau It's Over, Foreman Won!" After having the living hell scared out of me, I turned and looked at the television and saw Moorer stretched out on the canvas and Referee Joe Cortez counting him out. Amidst the pandemonium both in the arena in Las Vegas echoed by Jim Lampley’s legendary and emotional call “It Happened, IT HAPPENED!" as well as what was occuring in the Denison household, my father grabbed and hugged me. It was one of the few times I ever saw my father cry. He was genuinely happy to see Foreman regain the title he had lost to Muhammad Ali twenty years and one month earlier in October 1974. While all the excitement was going on, Foreman did not celebrate his triumph, instead when Cortez officially waved his arms over the fallen champion, Foreman knelt in prayer. Clearly, his achievement had a much deeper meaning than simply regaining the Heavyweight championship of the world. 


The moment for my father and I would be something he would talk about for the rest of his life and called it one of his favorite nights with his son. Subsequently upon my beginning my writing journey in November 1995, I was able to cover Foreman's last three fights against Crawford Grimsley, Lou Savareese, and Shannon Briggs between 1996 and 1997 when I was a teenager, the latter a controversial decision loss to Briggs for the then 48 year old Foreman, a fight I will always believe he won, ultimately was a sour end to a great career that should serve as a testament to anyone to never give up.


As I reflect on this incredible man and what was a journey for me as well as I experienced this inspirational story unfold in real time as Foreman went on this comeback, which he also called a private quest, I think about not only the memories it provided me with my father, which I think of more now and appreciate than I can ever put into words, but also the lesson Foreman taught of never give up. For someone who was born with cerebral palsy and has gone through his own ups and downs along the way admittedly, it's a lesson that I have had to remind myself of from time to time, but it is a lesson everyone should learn.


One of the things I am proud to be noted for is as a Boxing historian, I spend just as much time in the present day watching fight films as I did in my youth and that includes continuing to watch many of Foreman's bouts both from his first chapter and from the comeback period, all of which I recommend watching. When I was informed of Foreman's passing, it did as I said hit me hard, but at the same time, it instantly brought back all those fond memories. Unfortunately, I never had the opportunity to meet George Foreman in person as I have continued covering the sport I love, which he is one of the people who inspired me. It is something that I will always regret for the simple reason that I will be unable to say thank you in person for both the inspiration and for providing me with memories with my father that I will forever cherish. Mr. Foreman, thank you for the inspiration you provided me, for giving my father and I so many memories, and for your endless contributions to the sport of Boxing, but to humanity as well. Your legacy will live forever.  God bless you. Rest well.


“And That's The Boxing Truth." 



The Boxing Truth®️ is a registered trademark of Beau Denison All Rights Reserved.


Follow Beau Denison on the following Social Media Platforms:


X: (Formerly Twitter) www.twitter.com/Beau_Denison     



Facebook: www.facebook.com/BeauDenison1      



Threads: www.threads.net/@BeauDenison1     



Instagram: www.Instagram.com/BeauDenison1    


BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/beaudenison1.bsky.social 











Friday, March 21, 2025

Should Boxing Have A Price Cap If The PPV Model Is Going To Continue?

One of the themes that this observer has become known for over the many years I have covered Boxing has been my long-standing criticism regarding the pay-per-view model, both here on The Boxing Truth® ️ as well as numerous outlets both online and in print through the years. The primary reason behind the criticism is in two aspects, the overuse of the model in that cards that in years gone by that would have been featured on a sports centric network or as a Friday or Saturday night attraction on a premium cable network like HBO or Showtime, have instead been reserved for pay-per-view, rather than bouts of significant public interest that were heavily promoted and treated and viewed amongst Boxing fans as special events or occasions, which leads to the second aspect. The price points, which regardless of the perceived quality of a card or the main events have only gone up as time has gone on, which has led to declining buy numbers for most pay-per-view attractions. 


This in addition to now in an era dominated by subscription-based streaming at reasonable prices for consumers, has only continued to fuel my criticism and belief that Boxing needs to adapt to the changing landscape of media, in this case, how television is transitioning away from previous methods of distribution and embrace something that will be more budget-friendly for consumers. While I have long advocated for the sport to move away from the pay-per-view model, something which I still strongly believe in, one aspect I have touched on occasion in previous writings could be worth exploring and debating once again as we have entered the spring of 2025.


What aspect am I referring to dear reader? The subject of a price cap structure if the pay-per-view model is to continue. Before I delve into things further, I feel it important to state that I feel just as strongly that under a price cap structure, the issue and frankly danger of potential over use by promoters and networks would still exist and it would therefore be something that would need to be addressed.


Now, what exactly does this observer mean by implementing a price cap structure? In simple terms, putting a cap on how much a pay-per-view card could be priced regardless of what a main event might be. While some might laugh at such an idea, it is actually not a new concept and variations of a structure have been used before throughout the world with varying degrees of success. The most prominent example at least currently would be the pricing structure for pay-per-view events in the United Kingdom that are not priced above £25 (a little over $32 in U.S. dollars). By law, prices are kept at usually between £19.99-£21.99, but do not exceed that £25 mark, or at least I have never seen it done in various advertising materials I have observed that have circulated throughout the United Kingdom for various cards/events that were distributed via pay-per-view. While the United Kingdom did not get into the pay-per-view model until the 1990’s, such a pricing structure has proven to be successful in that it is not uncommon to see a card distributed via pay-per-view there do a million buys if not more there on a regular basis, which can be directly attributed to the affordable price points.


Here in the United States, there is no set price cap structure, but there have been times where the concept has at least been flirted with. Those of us of a certain age might remember a time where advertising and marketing for pay-per-view Boxing cards would not only promote an event heavily in the days and weeks prior to it, but depending on the cable/satellite provider and pay-per-view distributor, there would be a reduced price offered to customers if one chose to order an event prior to the day it was scheduled to take place. Throughout the 1980’s and much of the 1990’s, most price points, regardless of when an event was ordered, did not exceed $40.


During the mid-1990’s, a period of time when this observer was in his teenage years, but also the period of time I began my career as a writer covering Boxing as well as other combat sports, I spent time living in the New York area, and one thing about that time that sticks in my mind even over thirty years later, was the cable provider I had access to at the time did a few experimental things with regard to their Boxing pay-per-view offerings that should have been groundbreaking and somewhat of what I think could be achieved under a price cap structure if implemented properly.


At the time, Mike Tyson was in the midst of his comeback and seemingly after every Tyson card, which were often full top to bottom with competitive fights, there would inevitably be complaints that the fight did not last long enough to justify what was then seen as an expensive price point. (Between $34.95-$44.95 depending on cable provider/pay-per-view distributor.) Where I was at the time, my family and I had access to one of the numerous variations of cable providers that did business under the Cablevision banner. Both due to the length of time between back then and when this column is being penned by yours truly, I am unclear as to whether this was the main Cablevision provider in the New York area or an affiliate of that provider. I point this out for accuracy purposes. 


The concept that Cablevision came up with was a $9.95 per round idea. Before anyone misunderstands this idea, what it was, was one where say if a pay-per-view card was priced at $50, what they would do is have the concept that if the main event ended before round six, there would be a reduced price for the event. Meaning, if the main event ended in the first round the cost to those who ordered it would be $9.95. If it went five full rounds then they would pay the full $50 price, but it would be capped at that price point meaning that if a fight went six rounds or beyond, the price did not exceed $50. Cablevision was also the first cable provider in my recollection to experiment with the idea of packaging for pay-per-view events. For context, some may not remember that back in the mid to late 1990’s, both Showtime and HBO through their respective pay-per-view divisions Showtime Event Television (SET Pay-Per-View) and TVKO (Later renamed HBO Pay-Per-View) did cards on a seemingly rotating basis. If not every one to two months, it seemed as though they would at minimum rotate fiscal quarters where one would stage a pay-per-view card followed by the other in the next either month, bi-month, or fiscal quarter. 


In an attempt to follow up on their $9.95 per round concept for a time, Cablevision decided to offer pay-per-view Boxing events as a package. Say for example there were four separate pay-per-view cards on the calendar for the upcoming months. The cable provider would offer those events as a package for one price, while also giving the customer the option if they did not want to purchase the package to purchase them separately at each event’s respective full price. While I am not certain as to how long this concept lasted as I was in the process of moving at the time, it should show that there was at least the idea of offering value to the consumer for a single set price even as far back as thirty years ago long before the concept of streaming became mainstream. 


With that trip for this observer down memory lane concluded, the question is should a pricing cap structure be implemented here in the global streaming era as consumers move away from traditional cable/satellite television and towards subscription-based streaming and with pay-per-view distributors like InDemand (Formerly Viewer’s Choice) preparing to cease operations if pay-per-view is to continue to exist beyond 2025. The main hurdle obviously would be for promoters and networks to if not so much to agree to such a structure, but also to do so regardless of who might be on the card in order to put an emphasis on value for the consumer. While one would think the evidence of declining buy numbers and the issue of one aspect everyone including those of us who cover the sport do not like discussing, piracy, would be enough to bring all the above to the table both for their benefit as well as the overall health of the sport, it is a difficult task if nothing else because of each network’s and respective promoters vested interest. 


Recently, however, those behind the Riyadh Season-promoted Boxing cards staged in Saudi Arabia and throughout the world have seemed to gradually start implementing if not a price cap structure of it’s pay-per-view cards, at least a budget-friendly one for it’s pay-per-view cards with prices being under $30 in most cases. Although this is not a set structure as of this writing, at minimum, it shows that at least one promoter or brand is seeing the need to adapt. Adaptation, however, does not always mean that cards will be overwhelmingly successful even at a reduced/budget-friendly price point and should like everything else be viewed on a case-by-case basis. 


The recent pay-per-view card headlined by the rematch for the Undisputed World Light-Heavyweight championship between Artur Beterbiev and Dmitry Bivol, which was priced at $26.99 on DAZN Pay-Per-View here in the United States reportedly did 45,000 total buys. While not a reflection or either fighter’s standing in the sport, it is important to keep in mind that their first encounter in October of last year was offered free in the United States via ESPN+, while the undercard was offered as a $19.99 pay-per-view on DAZN. Whether the fact that the first fight being offered free as part of an ESPN+ subscription negatively impacted buys for the rematch, despite the full card being available on one platform globally rather than split between two platforms with a combination of included with subscription and paid add-on, is subject to debate. 


This observer feels it is more an indication that the number of cards offered on pay-per-view needs to be reduced if not outright done away with, which the latter I maintain would be better both for the sport and consumers in the long run. The problem then becomes both how would the number of cards be reduced and would promoters and networks be willing to keep the remaining slate of cards on subscription-based models like the one DAZN has, regardless of who might be on the top of those cards in order to keep pay-per-view offerings to a minimum where the concept can be both budget-friendly and viewed as special occasions in the sport where folks might be more willing to pay for those events legally. 


Unfortunately, regardless of how budget-friendly events are priced there will always be those who will look for free access to events. Although I am not one who supports the mentality of looking for not so legal workarounds to access events, I do sympathize with those who feel Boxing pay-per-views has become to expensive, which is one reason why I am in favor of replacing pay-per-view with reasonably priced subscription-based alternatives, which offer more content and value for the price rather than a pay-per-view on a per event basis model. As far as how things can be reduced, I believe that those who insist on the pay-per-view model should look back at how things were done in the 1980’s and for part of the 1990’s where the vast majority of Boxing events were split between either free over the air broadcast television on networks like ABC, NBC, CBS, and for a time Fox, and premium cable networks like HBO, Showtime, and basic cable networks like USA Network and ESPN. Those that were reserved for pay-per-view were considered major events, to the point where if one of the aforementioned networks did not produce those events and have a prearranged agreement in place, saw lucrative deals for rebroadcast/replay rights, were reasonably priced and were not frequently used so the value to the consumer remained.



Even now in a digital streaming era, it is important to keep value to the consumer as the main priority. Perhaps what should happen would amount to a reset of the model back to what it was in the aforementioned period, but with the difference being it taking place on streaming networks/platforms rather than free over the air television or premium/basic cable networks. Whether that means pay-per-view being used four times a year, which would amount to once per fiscal quarter or maybe between six or eight times a year, subscription-based models should be seen as the main selling point where pay-per-view is used strictly for special occasions even though they will be hosted on the same platforms. It will come down to whether those in the sport can for lack of a better term, get out of their own way and realize that things need to change, if they can set their respective egos aside, they should also realize that it will benefit themselves, the sport, and the fighters that compete in it in the long run. In the meantime, I would like to see most of the Boxing pay-per-view offerings capped under $40 regardless of whether it is offered via DAZN, ESPN+, or Prime Video.


Although that $40 figure is only a suggestion from someone who truly cares about the sport and wants to see it grow and thrive, and obviously in the case of DAZN and Prime Video, would vary by country given that they are global network platforms, I believe if pay-per-view is not used too often and is capped at $40 and not used as a starting price point, but the cap that it will not exceed,, at minimum things might improve, despite subscription-based models, which already exist offering better value and will only benefit those networks in the long term.


“And That’s The Boxing Truth.”


The Boxing Truth® is a registered trademark of Beau Denison All Rights Reserved. 


Follow Beau Denison on the following Social Media Platforms:



X: (Formerly Twitter) www.twitter.com/Beau_Denison 




Facebook: www.facebook.com/BeauDenison1 




Threads: www.threads.net/@BeauDenison1 



Instagram: www.Instagram.com/BeauDenison1    


BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/beaudenison1.bsky.social 















Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Vitali Klitschko To Be Honored With The Arthur Ashe Award For Courage During The 2022 ESPYS Presented By Capital One July 20 Live on ABC

 Press Release: By ESPN - Former Heavyweight Boxing champion and mayor of Kyiv, Vitali Klitschko, will be honored with the Arthur Ashe Award for Courage at the 2022 ESPYS, airing live on July 20 at 8 p.m. ET on ABC. The award is given to a deserving member of the sporting world who makes a difference far beyond the field of play, impacting the world in indelible ways.

Credit: Press Office Of Vitali Klitschko

 

Klitschko, who has been the city’s mayor since 2014, has been a central figure in his country’s defense since it was invaded by Russian forces in late February. As the capital city endured a weeks-long siege and fought to keep Kyiv under control, Klitschko has served as one of the faces of the Ukrainian resilience inspiring people around the world. Together with his brother Wladimir, also a former heavyweight champion, the Klitschkos pledged to take up arms alongside their fellow citizens, and were leaders in Ukrainians’ remarkable response to the invasion. That response included other boxers out of the nation’s rich tradition of fighting like Vasiliy Lomachenko, the two-time Olympic gold medalist and one of the best pound-for-pound boxers in the world, and Oleksandr Usyk, a top heavyweight contender, returning home to join defense battalions themselves.

 

"It is a great honor for me to receive this award,” said Klitschko. “I am convinced that this is a recognition of the courage and inviolability of the Ukrainian people, who have been bravely resisting the Russian aggressor for more than 3 months. This is an award for everyone who defends the independence and freedom of Ukraine.”

 

The Klitschkos are, perhaps improbably, the sons of a Soviet major general, and grew up boxing in the old Soviet amateur system. Vitali finished his professional career with a 45-2 record, winning a WBO heavyweight title and maybe most memorably fighting Lennox Lewis in a tightly-contested, vicious 2003 bout that had to be stopped due to a deep cut over Klitschko’s eye (and his impassioned pleas to let him keep fighting).

 

Vitali Klitschko first entered the Ukrainian political sphere in 2006, on a hiatus from boxing, when he ran for mayor of Kyiv and finished second in the election. He would remain politically active even as he returned to the ring, and initially committed to running for president in 2014 before ultimately entering the mayoral race and winning. He’s since become the longest-serving mayor in the city’s history, remaining a prominent figure in the country. That, of course, has continued in wartime, with Klitschko speaking at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland just a few weeks ago, imploring its influential audience that their biggest mistake would be to think that impact of the war in Ukraine is confined to its borders.

 

“Vitali’s poise and strength as his city and country faces unfathomable tests have far surpassed the incredible resolve he demonstrated as one of boxing’s top heavyweight champions,” said Executive Editor-At-Large ESPN Content, Rob King. “His commitment to the people of Ukraine has been a global inspiration, and his bravery is a prime example of the resilience of the human spirit. It is our privilege to bestow him with the Arthur Ashe Courage Award.”

 

The Ashe Award has become one of the most prominent, prestigious, and talked-about honors in sports, and has recognized global icons like Muhammad Ali and Nelson Mandela, little-known heroes like Zaevion Dobson and Emmanuel Ofosu Yeboah, sports legends like Pat Summitt and Billie Jean King, and many more.

Material Courtesy of: ESPN/ Photo Courtesy of: The Press Office of Vitali Klitschko Used with permission.

The Boxing Truth® is a registered trademark of Beau Denison All Rights Reserved.